Globalization, Reforms Give Rise to Spike in
Prosecutions.
By Carrie Johnson
Prosecutors and stock market regulators on the hunt for fraud
increasingly are targeting companies paying foreign government officials in a
bid to secure contracts, according to Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission
officials.
This year the
"There's been more prosecutions in the last three years than
probably the history of the statute," said Joseph Warin, a longtime
Among the forces fueling the trend are the increasingly global reach of
business and reforms ushered in after the last round of U.S. corporate
scandals, which are prompting executives to dig deeper into their operations to
find wrongdoing and turn themselves in, hoping for leniency. U.S. law
enforcement, meanwhile, is marshaling more resources in a bid to level the
playing field for companies competing against foreign rivals.
Nearly a dozen energy companies are under investigation for alleged
payoffs to Nigerian customs officials, and the giant
insurance broker Aon recently told investors it had received
a subpoena seeking information about its foreign operations, part of what it
called an industry-wide probe. Authorities in the United States and Germany are negotiating with Daimler to
resolve allegations that the automaker paid foreign officials to win business
in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe.
In all, nearly 60 more federal cases are in the pipeline, according to
defense lawyers who make a living by fending off such inquiries. Although the
numbers remain small as a percentage of the government's corporate fraud case
list, they represent a significant increase in the number of new cases and have
become a priority of top law enforcers.
For the first time, the FBI is devoting five agents in the
Washington field office solely to enforce the Watergate-era law called the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, noted Mark F. Mendelsohn, the prosecutor who
oversees the initiative.
The law gives prosecutors the authority to target
The issue has been sensitive for American companies because other
countries, including France, Japan and Italy, only recently began prosecuting corporate
bribes to foreign officials. Until a decade ago, bribes were tax deductible in
many European countries.
Britain has yet to bring a successful bribery
prosecution, a source of contention for
Amid the outcry, the U.S. Justice Department opened its own
probe of BAE. Among the items in investigators' sights is a Washington bank
account controlled by former ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan, according to
lawyers following the case.
But if
Lawyers involved in the cases attribute the growth spurt to a steep
increase in companies that are turning themselves in to prosecutors when
employees or auditors flag questionable overseas payments. Companies that
cooperate with prosecutors are supposed to receive leniency -- an incentive for
them to come forward. One was Tyco International, which last year agreed
to pay $50 million to settle a civil case over cash and gifts its Brazilian and
South Korean employees lavished on authorities to win construction and water
business.
Cheryl Scarboro, an associate enforcement director at the Securities
and Exchange Commission, said regulators increasingly seek not only corporate
fines but also the big-dollar profits that companies earn on contracts awarded
because of bribes.
Yet the high costs of investigating and the trouble of gaining access
to documents and witnesses overseas can complicate a company's decision to blow
the whistle on itself.
Engineering giant ABB paid a $16 million fine to settle
government charges, but at a conference in Paris a company executive estimated the
total cost of the scandal was far higher because its own investigation ate up
more than 44,000 hours of lawyer time, said Alexandra Wrage, president of TRACE
International, an Annapolis nonprofit that provides
anti-bribery services.
Thomas Schmidt, a spokesman for ABB, based in Zurich, said the company's investigation of
suspect payments by a former subsidiary was "a very lengthy and costly
exercise" that involved intense effort by a team of outside lawyers and
accountants.
Increasingly, businesses may make a different calculation: choosing to
take matters into their own hands by firing culpable workers and stepping up
oversight of international units rather than bringing the problem to the
government, which may not have sufficient resources to uncover far-flung
corrupt payments without a nod from company insiders, said analysts who study
the issue.
Daimler, the German company whose Mercedes unit is under scrutiny, took
numerous steps to strengthen its accounting practices and hand over information
to the U.S. and German governments after problems came to light, according to
SEC filings. Several executives have been dismissed and one who worked in a
Nigeria-based division committed suicide as the probe intensified.
Dieter Zetsche, the company's chief executive, said Daimler had
invested "a huge amount of money" and management attention on the
issue. "We are really going through every small corner of this company on
a global basis," he told Washington Post reporters and editors at a
meeting yesterday. Zetsche declined to put a price tag on the cost of the
investigation, for which the firm has hired lawyers at Skadden Arps in the
District, but said, "It's big. It's big."