Wall
Street Journal
(8.17.10)
WTO Orders EU To Lift Tech Tariffs
BRUSSELS—The World Trade Organization ordered the
European Union to strike down import tariffs on billions of dollars of
high-tech goods or risk retaliatory trade sanctions.
In dollar
terms, the decision could be one of the biggest wins yet for the U.S. at the
Geneva-based trade body.
The dispute concerns the 1996 Information Technology
Agreement, a trade treaty signed by some 70 countries that set 0% tariffs on a
wide category of electronic goods.
%20(WSJ%208.17.10)_files/image002.jpg)
A 1996 treaty set 0% tariffs on a wide category of
electronic goods.
The ITA accounts for $5 billion a year in tariffs that
don't have to be paid, according to industry groups.
"U.S. high-tech companies and their workers
depend on the ITA to reach foreign markets," said John Neuffer, vice
president of the Washington-based Information Technology Industry Council.
Global trade in products covered by the ITA increased
to $4 trillion in 2008 from $1.2 trillion in 1996.
The dispute among the signatories was over the definition of
"high-tech."
![[WTO]](Article.WTO%20Case%20(ITA%20Agrement)%20(WSJ%208.17.10)_files/image004.gif)
The European Union declined to designate as high-tech three
categories of goods: television cable converter boxes that also deliver the
Internet, flat-panel computer screens, and printers that also scan, fax or
copy.
The EU argued that these products were old-fashioned consumer goods,
not cutting-edge high-tech products.
Under the EU's tariff classifications, these goods were considered ordinary
cable boxes, TV screens and photocopiers, subject to tariffs between 6% and
14%.
The EU's total imports of these products were valued
at $11 billion in 2007, according to the ITIC.
The U.S., Japan and Taiwan for years lobbied the EU to
reduce these tariffs.
The three countries are home to some of the world's
largest makers of electronic goods.
Those with operations in the U.S., such as Hewlett-Packard Co., Dell Inc. and Japan-based Canon Inc., have
taken a front position in lobbying the EU to lower its tariffs and in lobbying
the U.S. government to take the case to the WTO.
The EU, a U.S. trade official said, was
"manipulating tariffs to discourage technological innovation."
The EU declined to remove the tariffs.
In 2008, the three countries filed a case against the
EU at the WTO.
The wording in Monday's ruling was clear: The WTO's
arbitration panel requested "the European Communities to bring the
relevant measures into conformity with its obligations."
U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk hailed the decision
as "an important victory for U.S. technology manufacturers and
workers."
The EU now has 60 days to appeal. The 27-nation bloc
is divided on high-tech tariff policy, so it isn't a given that it will appeal.
If it does, the WTO will rule within three months.
"The report does not establish general principles
that would imply any form of generalized conclusions," the European
Commission said in a statement. "No decision on a possible appeal to the
WTO report is taken yet."
EU officials say, however, that they would like to
renegotiate the entire ITA.
If the EU doesn't respect the WTO ruling and lift the
tariffs, the U.S., Japan and Taiwan would have the right to impose tariffs on
goods made in Europe—including cars, pharmaceuticals and cheese—valued at an
amount equal to the tariffs that the WTO has now ruled illegal.